本帖最后由 belle 于 2013-5-10 17:51 编辑
发信人: belle (蓓儿), 版面: USANews
标 题: Re: 英国禁枪的启示,就是禁枪没用
发信站: 阿凡提BBS (2013/02/13 14:31:29 EST)
奇怪,我查了查,有的文章说英国禁枪有用,有的文章说英国禁枪没用。有没有官方的比较完整的统计数据?
至于澳洲,英国禁枪一开始也有犯罪率高企的时候(守法公民上缴了枪,犯罪分子没有上缴),澳洲地广人稀,这个时间很可能会更长一些。不知道有没有一直到最近的统计数据(我看到的文章统计到2005就没了)?
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
发信人: belle (蓓儿), 版面: USANews
标 题: Re: 英国禁枪的启示,就是禁枪没用
发信站: 阿凡提BBS (2013/02/13 17:44:19 EST)
为什么说澳洲禁枪没用?
by Washington Post’s Dylan Matthews and Slate’s Will Oremus:
[H]omicides by firearm plunged 59 percent between 1995 and 2006, with no corresponding increase in non-firearm-related homicides. The drop in suicides by gun was even steeper: 65 percent. Studies found a close correlation between the sharp declines and the gun buybacks. Robberies involving a firearm also dropped significantly. Meanwhile, home invasions did not increase, contrary to fears that firearm ownership is needed to deter such crimes. But here’s the most stunning statistic. In the decade before the Port Arthur massacre, there had been 11 mass shootings in the country. There hasn’t been a single one in Australia since.
gun-buyback also correlates with decreased suicide rate:
图表都是网上找的,如果你有更全面的统计图请拿出来。
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/12/18/gun-control-port-arthur/1778519/
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
发信人: belle (蓓儿), 版面: USANews
标 题: Re: 英国禁枪的启示,就是禁枪没用
发信站: 阿凡提BBS (2013/02/13 20:38:23 EST)
查到了,英国禁枪现在来看还没有起到多大的作用,不过可能会有进步。
【在 belle (叮当) 的大作中提到:】
:奇怪,我查了查,有的文章说英国禁枪有用,有的文章说英国禁枪没用。有没有官方的比较完整的统计数据?
:至于澳洲,英国禁枪一开始也有犯罪率高企的时候(守法公民上缴了枪,犯罪分子没有上缴),澳洲地广人稀,这个时间很可能会更长一些。不知道有没有一直到最近的统计数据(我看到的文章统计到2005就没了)?
:..........
附图: Brit_gun_crime.gif [删除]
|